Booster Shots for your Search for Story

Things to keep in mind as you plan, draft, revise and dream, in no particular order… because there is no particular order:

An “idea” for a story is NOT a story.  Any more than a seed is a tree.  You have lots of watering and fertilizing to do before the seed becomes something that will live.

There are, at minimum, eleven qualities and specific focuses you need to deliver to your story.  You can stumble upon them or you can shoot for them from an informed baseline of knowledge… your call.

There are six specific realms of “story physics” that determine it’s level of effectiveness and power.  These are the qualitative essences of a story: a compelling premise… dramatic tension… effective pacing… hero empathy… vicarious experience… functional execution. 

That last one is composed of six core competencies (so we don’t count it twice, resulting in 11 things you need to know).  These comprise the toolbox, the design kit, for your story: concept… character… theme… structure (with about 10 sub-topics included here)… scene execution and writing voice.

If you go 11 for 11, you stand a shot.  If you choose to disregard or take for granted any of these eleven variables, you’re playing loose with your odds.  And if you have no real understanding of them as an integrated whole… well, this is why writing a great story is so  hard. 

There is a meaningful difference — in writing and in reading — between a novel and a memoir.  When you try to blur the fence between them in your fiction, then the structural criteria for the novel trumps the sequential telling of what really happened.

Truth may be stranger than fiction, but within a novel the truth about what really happened may not be your best dramatic option.

Know what your story is about.  If your take on this is that it’s about a place, an issue, a character, a true account of something, or anything else that isn’t conflict-focused, then your answer is incomplete.  A story is about something happening… with stakes hanging in the balance.  It’s not a story until that takes center stage.

If there’s no conflict, there’s no tension.  No tension, no story.  No stakes, no tension.  It’s simple, really.

Your hero needs a goal to reach, a problem to solve, a quest calling them, a journey to take, or some combination of these… unfolding in context to palpable opposition that will block their path as it (the antagonistic force or character) seeks opposing objectives, and/or simply seeks to defeat and torment your hero.  

Your bad guy needs a motive, too.

Character-based fiction is not immune to this universal law of dramatic physics.  No conflict, no story. 

If you are writing a series and you haven’t been published, then you are better served by writing the first book as a stand-alone.  Because you won’t get to write the series until the first book succeeds in the marketplace.  And for that to manifest, you simply can’t present a “stay tuned for Book #2 to see what happens” ending. 

Anything over 100,000 words is too long in today’s market.  Shoot for 80,000 or less.  This is true for historical and sci-fi/fantasy, too.  Those books you love that are longer than that are by authors who play by different rules than newbies. 

Never let exceptions to any of this seduce you into believing you can be one of them.

You can’t  invent a new story structure.  Even if you try, it must conform to certain narrative expectations.  This was true for Quentin Tarantino, and it’s true for you.  Be creative, be fresh, be innovative, give us something we haven’t seen before.  But it can’t be a new species of fiction.  This is professional writing – for money – not experimental writing.

All writing teachers worth their salt are telling you the same basic things, using different contexts and languages and models.  Which is all good.  The essence of 4-part story structure is nothing but an expansion (necesssary and valuable, because it is clarifying) on classic 3-part dramatic narrative.  It’s the Hero’s Journey without the character-focused, softer vocabulary.  It goes deeper in one direction, while applying specificity in another.  They compliment each other with perfect harmony and fluid logic.

All the paint and accessories and scented leather in the world isn’t worth a dime in the fiction world if the engine doesn’t work.

There is a huge and significant difference between your theme and your plot.  When you write a story that is a thinly disguised platform for your passionate views and beliefs, without conflict at the center of it all, you’ll find the going rough.  You may like the outcome, but agents and editors will say, “yeah, but what’s the story?”  The DaVinci Code had a plot.  And if it pissed you off, then it had a theme, too… one you’d have never heard about had it not been for that plot.

Do you really know what the word “story” means?  If not — and there are criteria here — stop everything and go back to this all-important Square One.  I’ve met writers who have been drafying manuscripts for decades who really didn’t understand what a true story is made of. 

If asked what the most important, required, non-negotiable single word in fiction is, if your answer isn’t “conflict,” then you don’t really know what a story is.

If your story is “character-driven,” you are by no means immune to the necessity to have a plot that presents conflict and stakes.  Plot is the stage upon which character unfolds.  Without that stage, your character is standing on a corner preaching to passing traffic.

The stories put forth by proven A-list writers may not be sufficient models for writers looking to break in.  The game at that level is entirely different, including where the bar resides.   An A-list writer has an entire floor full of editors contributing to the moulding and polishing of the story you read under their name.  You have nothing other than your own sense of craft.  

Your idea, and the story that springs from it, needs a large dose of heat and fascination.  The concept that arises from your idea (note how that works) must ask a question that that reader yearns to have answered.  If the question at the heart of your is banal, vanilla or otherwise old news, there’s not much you can do to pump new life into its execution.  A great character interacting with a boring plot will sink you.  

You can’t write a story about anything, relying on execution to make it work.  The cliche is true: in fiction you really can’t make chicken salad out of chicken… droppings.  Work on the strength of your idea/concept/premise first, jack it to its highest inherent potential, before you begin to develop a vision for the story that ensues from it.  Sometimes you have to actually write that story to discover this… just make sure you recognize what you’re doing in that case — you are engaging in the search for story.  Don’t shortcut it, this is where the gold is found.

Are you writing your story because you really want to write a story, any story… or are you writing a story because the premise keeps you up at night?  This alone is often the difference between success and failure.  The forced concoction of the unlikely and the mundane and the illogical and the ridiculous is the common threat of the slush pile.

There is a difference between a Prologue and an opening chapter.  Both can — and should — deliver a hook. 

If you can’t adequately describe your story in a 30-second elevator pitch, leaving the listener wanting to know what happens, or if you can’t write that down in two pages or less with the same result… if you excuse this by saying, “well, it’s sort of complicated“… then you may, a) not be ready to actually write it; or b) be in trouble if you try; and for sure, c) won’t be able to pitch it to an agent successfully.  Knowing the core essence of your story, the spine, the central conflict and how it relates to your hero, is the essence of knowing your story.  Which you must before you can write it with optimal effectiveness.  Which should be your goal.  

In short, there is more than one way to skin the storytelling cat, but at the end of the day it was still a cat before you took a knife and hammer to it.

If you’re struggling with what to write, in what order, and why… find a published story (preferrably a movie on DVD) similar to yours (yes, you can) and study it.  Break it down.  Notice the structure.  The sub-plot and the subtext.

Sub-plot and sub-text are different things, often wearing the same set of clothes.

Each scene you write should have a succinct expositional mission.  Something to contribute to the unfolding plot, building toward something.  It should also – not as its mission, but as an expectation – illustrate and contribute toward character and sub-text.  A scene that does one without the other is weak.  A scene that does too much of either is also weak.  You don’t seal the marraige deal on the first date, you don’t win the World Series in one inning,so don’t try.

One of the key fatal words in storytelling: episodic.  If you concoct a series of things that happen to your hero, each shown as a new scene, simply to demonstrate how the hero reacts to that particular moment (characterization), one after another, leading to nothing other than a full exposition of a character’s life or experience within a given time span… that’s episodic fiction.  Not good.

The antidote to episodic fiction: a plot.  A problem for your hero to solve, a goal to reach, with an obstacle to it, with something at stake.  One spine, even if it bends.

If you’re stuck – you call it “blocked” – then something may be wrong with your story.  Not you.  It’s your inner editor trying to get your attention, and doing so by shutting down the screen of your imagination, so you won’t continue to pursue a broken idea.  There are two ways out of this mess: return to the basics of story structure and the power of story physics (those 11 things mentioned earlier), and change something.  Play “what if?” games with what you started with, where you are, and where you’d like to end up.  Take risks, think outside the box, and listen when your inner editor begins to scream with approval.

Take inventory of where you are in your story, and ask yourself, for any given moment and every scene and story point… can this be better?  A better setting?  A better backstory?  What will jack up the tension here?  What would make this character, this moment, or empathic and vicarious for my reader?  What would make this more interesting?

Unless your plot dictates what your hero does for a living, give her or him something fascinating as a career.  IN a good way, or even a creepy way.  Something we don’t see everyday, something that takes place behind the common curtain of awareness.  And then pull that curtain back for us to see.  If this becomes part of the story, contributing context or a story point, then you have an “arena” story on your hands… a very good thing.  I’ve said this before, but here goes: a love story set in an accounting office… boring.  A love story set in a convent… now that’s interesting.

There is a critical difference between a hook, an inciting incident and a First Plot Point.  All three are powerful tools in the Part 1 (first quartile) set-up of your story.  Know the difference, because any attempt to swap one for the other, including a casual placement that doesn’t optimize story physics, will render your story in a lesser form.

The First Plot Point is the most important – and the most heavily imbued with purpose – moment in your story.  Screw this up and everything in your story suffers for it.

Overwriting, trying to make the reader notice your eloquence or style or wit to the point where they are distracted, will hurt your chances.  Your writing voice is like a scent in the air: be careful you don’t stink up the place with too much cologne.  Less is more.  Timing and subtlety are everything.

Story trumps prose.  Story trumps character.  Story trumps theme.  If you doubt this, ask an agent or an editor in the publishing business.  Oh, they’ll tell you that its all important… but if the story doesn’t cut it, no matter how good the rest of the effort, they’ll reject you.

Agents and editors view prose, character and theme as minimum requirements, and when judged as weak it becomes excuse to reject the work (see if this sounds familiar: “You write beautifully, but I couldn’t invest in your hero and found myself skimming, the story needs more meat.”)  What they’re looking for most of all is the home run story, the killer premise, the original idea.  They’ll tell an interviewer they’re looking for “the next great writing voice,” which they are, but within a story that rocks their world. 

When a reader “doesn’t get” your story, especially a professional reader, its your fault.  It wasn’t written well enough. When you hear that feedback, it’s an opportunity.  Say thank you and go into revision mode, they may have just saved a year of your writing life.  Don’t shoot the messenger.  

Everybody is a story planner.  It’s just a question of how you plan.  Your story won’t work until you find it, hone it, reduce it to a core essence and build upon it.  Only then can you really execute it to its highest potential.  Whether you outline or pants a draft isn’t the issue — you’re still planning

This realization will empower you to recognize when you are crossing the line from planning to meaningful drafting.  The Great Fatal Error of fiction is that you mistake one for the other along the way.  It’s all “story planning” until you decide you have the story where you want it, where you need it to be.  At its optimal level of execution.  Which won’t be the first draft.  But it doesn’t have to wait until the fourth or eleventh draft, either, that’s just a function of process, which may or may not be yours.  Knowing when it reaches that level, knowing when your search is over and you’re ready to execute the final draft, is the key to success.

Please consider my book, “Story Engineering,” if you’d like to learn more about any of this, especially those 11 essential essences and core competencies.

Feeling inpetuous?  Join me next week in Portland, Oregon at the Willamette Writers Conference (along with about 2000 other writers from around the country, including more than a few from elsewhere), where I’ll be doing three workshops on, well, all of the above.  August 3 -5.


Filed under Write better (tips and techniques)

14 Responses to Booster Shots for your Search for Story

  1. margret baillie shipp

    In story engineering you thanked God for screenwriters. Well I thank God for you. I’m an organic writer who has been writing for years and is unpublished. I’ve resisted screen writing terminology-actually it scared the hell out of me. But I told you not long ago that I have followed So I finally bought Story Eng. put my writing on hold and told myself to open my mind, and wham, have I been repaid tenfold. I can see where I have gone wrong. Organic writing is all very well on one level, it’s naive when you do it without the knowledge of story structure. I’m a painter. When I studied tertiary level it was drummed into us that all painters are liars – to the extent that they protect their creativity, their source etc. I suspect writers are as well. That’s not a bad thing, though I think it vaguely dishonest when they’re writing a how to book (I’ve dozens) Some best sellers say they don’t plan. Or they can do it in two drafts. I think they are perpetuating the myth of the genius artist. Okay they are genius at what they do, but they definitely put their tent poles in place, I don’t care how much they deny it. They probably have your book tucked aways somewhere. Gotta giggle at the vision of Steph. King absorbing Larry Brooks.
    To successfully put oil on linen I have to know certain things. I spent nine years studying those certain things, and not the mechanics, but the history of art as well. I’m alway buying art books and I hide them well from people coming into my studio.
    I don’t know why, knowing this, it’s taken me so long with writing. Keep well Larry and thank you for writing this book.

  2. This post provides an overview of the full fiction-writing process. In my opinion, if new writers read this post, dig below the surface of each kernel of wisdom (and this can be done by examining earlier posts of Larry’s), and diligently apply what they’ve learned, their storytelling has a remarkable opportunity to jump into the realm of publishable works. Print this post out, folks, and put it on your writing desk. And be grateful to Larry Brooks for keeping you on the right path.

    I’ve been out of the loop because of health problems, but I’m back now and glad to return to the Storyfix fold. It’s good to see Larry hasn’t missed a beat!

  3. Abby G

    This is an incredible post! A great look at the writing process. Thank you, Larry!

  4. Larry, this is awesome. Would you please put this in a pdf to download from your site! I will be sending this to a lot of editing clients! So right on. Keep it coming!

  5. Bonnita Davidtsz

    WOW! Or as the majority says here in South Africa, Viva! Viva! Many thanx Larry – your generosity is mind-boggling. Am still struggling with the plot (what plot?) because the dominance of the theme that you so rightly objected to, just percolates through everything. But will gird the loins now to do better battle with that nemesis. Luv you to bits Larry. Enjoy your upcoming workshops.

  6. spinx

    Best post ever.

    Congrats – with just this post alone, you have your newbie ready to go and take off.

  7. Most of the writing I’ve done in the past has been journalism, poetry and songwriting. Odd mix huh? Anyway, I resisted form and story for so long that it finally percolated up into an 85,000 word pantsed novel last October. Since then, I’ve been learning story elements (great thanks to your website and book), learning to edit and doing ten hour days at it.

    I began the novel from a character sketch I had written some time ago of an older fellow, a man who is a junk collector living in the east side of Vancouver, BC. One day I thought, what if he had a daughter who found him after fifteen years of thinking he’d died when she was young? And then when she finds him, she hangs back and just records his life and her feelings in a journal without introducing herself.

    But as I wrote the first draft it burgeoned into a dark fantasy – a completely different story. So I edited and revised for the past seven months (took a month off after the first draft), but I always had this niggle that the story wasn’t quite right. I’m not big on fantasy writing and the fantasy elements of my manuscript are very minimal – the majority of it is psychological thriller, but not a souped-up thriller.

    So after I read this post yesterday, I milled about the house, as I have been doing for months, wondering if I should finally just decide to rewrite the whole thing as a psychological thriller. I thought hard and it finally clicked, a penny dropped – whatever. Once it hit the ground I just knew, I smiled inside – this is the actual story I want to write.

    So thanks a mil – great post to say the least.

    And as far as your own writing style and any critics I’ve come across about overstating points – I think it might just be a critic’s angle, a way to take a boost in clicks from someone doing great things. The way I see it, a bit of rambling and reiterating is like poetry, like brainwashing – I mean that’s what we need to get it to sink in – teachers do it all the time. Keep up the good work. I am constantly inspired by your writing.

  8. Pingback: How I decided to rewrite my entire novel. | Bree Curious

  9. Larry,

    I just ordered your book. I look forward to studying! I’ve been writing, from my heart, for three years. Now it’s time to learn the craft. Thanks for being a teacher.

    Rhonda Hayes

  10. Larry;
    Incredible information. So much here, I’ll need to print it off and digest it for a while. You did answer a few questions I had about moving my character and their conflict along. I especially appreciated your comment about knowing what your story is about. I may need to print that out in bold letters and post it above my desk, as sometimes its just to easy to lose site of the forest for the trees.

  11. Pingback: Friday Features #16 | Yesenia Vargas

  12. Pingback: Writing Blog Treasures 8~4 | Gene Lempp ~ Writer

  13. Hi Larry,

    This is my first time visiting your site and what a blog post to start with. I admit to needing to read it a few times to pull together everything – there’s a lot of information to digest. It did, however, incite me to add Story Engineering to my digital library. On my way to the back porch to read it now.

    Thanks! Looking forward to more posts.


  14. Pingback: Friday Favorites | Stanalei Fletcher