Storycraft for serious authors.
Epiphanies await.

An Interview With Bestselling Author Robert Dugoni

dugoni head shotJust possibly the hottest author in the business right now.

If you think that’s hyperbole, consider this: shortly after his new novel — The Eighth Sister — launched in early April, Amazon updated their Author Ranking list, and he was just that: he was in the #1 slot. The second most popular author that week was some Brit YA writer named J.K. Rowling.

I think you’ll admit, that’s something few of us would admit to even aspiring to.

That book, which is a spy thriller inspired by a true story, comes smack in the middle of his sizzling mystery/thriller series that launched with My Sister’s Grave (2014, also from Thomas & Mercer, with over two million copies sold and counting, with the subsequent six titles in the series all hitting multiple bestseller lists). And if that wasn’t enough, his self-described magnum opus, The Extraordinary Life of Sam Hell  (2018, from Lake Union Publishing) is a multiple-award winning darling of the book club circuit with over 3200 Amazon reviews (82 percent 5-stars), and is reportedly making John Irving nervous.

All of which makes me, in a much quieter way, one of the most blessed authors in the business. Because Robert Dugoni wrote the foreword to my new writing book, Great Stories Don’t Write Themselves (October, from Writers Digest Books). And he’s the ideal candidate to do it, since he also teaches frequently on the workshop and conference circuit, and, like me, is a stickler for craft, while being a nice counter-point to my planning-centric approach… because Robert Dugoni is a more organic writer, what we sometimes refer to as a pantser without the slightest implication of  judgment.

He’s proof that pantsing, just like like story planning, is neither the higher or the lower road to success, or even an explanation for either outcome. It’s simply a preference of process… and only that. Both pansting and planning/outlining require a keen sense of story, built upon a dues-paid, thick-skinned apprenticeship during which the principles and criteria of craft become self-evident, omnipresent and non-negotiable, and thus — and it doesn’t happen for everyone — part of the writer’s DNA.

The mission of this website is to share knowledge and inspire a vision for stories and careers. No better way to get back into that lane than with an interview like this one.

*****

LB: Inquiring writers want to know… does a rollout like the one you’ve just experienced (The Eighth Sister) ever get old? How many appearances did you make? What’s the craziest thing that has happened on this one… and the best thing?

RD: Touring for a new novel can be exhausting. I once was on the road for 23 days – something like 12 cities. There’s not a lot of glamour involved. You often don’t have time to even see much of the city. Working with Amazon publishing I can be much more selective in my appearances and the timing of those appearances. They are also constantly looking beyond the norm, trying to find events that will help move the needle. They often use one appearance for multiple purposes.

8th sister cover For example, for The Eighth Sister they combined a book signing with a wine tasting and light Hors d’oeuvres at Chateau San Michelle winery in Woodinville. It was a great evening and everyone really had a good time. That would have to be the highlight of this tour. The craziest night was my experience signing with Lisa Scottoline at the Poisoned Pen in Phoenix. She’s very funny and she’ll say just about anything. It made for a wild night and a lot of fun.

(LB side note: I was there at that Poisoned Pen signing, and he’s right, he and Lisa played off each other like seasoned comics.)

LB: What’s the best question anyone has ever asked you about your writing process, and the craft that underscores it? I think we can intuit the obvious and perhaps insidious questions, but does something stand out as incisive or rare?

RD: I was teaching a class one time and talking about plotting and character development and this poor guy in the class just looked forlorn. He finally raised his hand and he said, “You do all of this on the first draft?”  And it made me realize that I wasn’t teaching writing. I was teaching craft. I wasn’t teaching the first draft. I was teaching the second and the third draft. So I stopped and I told the class, the first draft is your draft. It’s your chance to get your story out of your head and onto the page. I’m a big believer in not self-editing a first draft, to let your subconscious flow and to just get out of the way of the story. On the second draft, and the drafts thereafter, however, you’re no longer a writer. You’re an editor. That’s when you’re looking to cut and to edit and to change what you’ve crafted knowing the principles that you’ve studied and learned. Now I tell everyone of my students at the beginning of the class – the difference (for me) happens between the first and the second draft.

LB: How does the relationship between your work as a conference workshop presenter inform your work as a novelist? Or vice versa?

RD: I liken the experience to a mechanic working on everyone else’s cars. It forces you to evaluate what works and what doesn’t and why. It helps you to see when an engine is running smoothly and when it needs some work. Teaching reinforces all the principles that go into writing a book. For instance, letting the character tell the reader what he wants in every scene, so the reader has a vested interest in that scene and in that character succeeding. Then putting obstacles in the path of the protagonist’s goal to create tension in that scene. When I teach, I’m learning. When I’m learning, I’m a better writer.

LB: If ten bestselling authors gave a workshop, I believe we’d get ten takes on how its done, and why. Do you agree? What is the common ground to listen for, and how do we explain to new writers when they hear one credible author say one thing, and another say something completely different on the same issue?

RD: I do agree. It is one of the reasons why I never teach process. I teach principles. I liken my teaching to being a golf coach. Every person who swings a golf club does it a little differently. But if the person is getting results, there’s no reason to correct the swing.  If a golfer is slicing the ball, a good golf coach will first tell the student the principal behind the ball slicing so that the student knows and understands why the ball is doing what it is doing and can then seek to fix it.  I ask students all the time, “Should a character change throughout a novel?” They all say, “yes” because they’ve read somewhere that characters should change. So I then ask, “Why?” You’d be amazed at the blank stares I get. I ask, “How much should a character change? More blank stares. If a student doesn’t understand the principal behind a character’s need to change, how can they fix it?  I tell students to study the craft and then find what process works best for them. But I also tell them don’t be stubborn. There are certain principles that underscore all good fiction – plots that move, characters in action, tension, tension and more tension. Ignore those principles and the process doesn’t matter..

LB: I’ve developed a hypothesis: relative to that variance between what writing teachers and gurus and authors are saying about what a novel is, how we do the work, and why… I believe the only real debate concerns process. That the outcome we seek is really beyond debate–the criteria that makes a novel work, or when skipped or minimized, cause it to just sit there–and is absolutely something that can be defined, taught and learned. But when the discussion polarizes relative to process it seems to also polarize what we believe about the fundamentals, as well (thus licensing the “there are no rules” guys), and that can confuse and even prove toxic to some writers.

What do you think about this issue?  As for me, I’ve become avidly process-neutral, while becoming more clear on what the craft offers and what it demands of the books we create.

RD: I think you hit it on the head and essentially repeated what I just said. I agree wholeheartedly. How an author works – whether she outlines or is an organic writer, is that writer’s process. Whether they edit their work as they write or just barf out a first draft, is their process. Whether they work during the day or at night, whether they listen to music or need silence, is part of their unique process. I once taught with a woman who said “Writing is just one rule. It needs to work.”  Well, that’s great, but if a new writer follows that one rule, then how do they ever learn?

A teacher might say, “It’s not working.” Then the writer asks, “Why not?” To which the teacher answers, “Well, that’s part of your process. So you have to figure it out.” And round and round we go.

No. A good teacher says your process isn’t working because you don’t understand the principles of the craft. You don’t understand that a strong opening needs a hook, having the reader meet someone interesting right away, someone they can can root for, if not relate to, and a tangible goal that character needs, with desires or wants, but that’s out of reach or feasibility at first. They can’t have what they want because of certain obstacles that create tension and drives good fiction. If you don’t understand the fundamental purposes of an obstacle then the middle of your book will sag because it is repetitive, there is no forward motion to the story. Your ending is unsatisfying because you don’t understand the principles that lead to a satisfying ending.

In short, you may be hitting a thousand golf balls everyday but you’re hitting them all the wrong way, so you’re not getting any better. You’re just reinforcing bad habits.

LB: What would you say to your younger writer self about something you know now that you didn’t know then? Perhaps an example of, “I didn’t know what I didn’t know.”

RD: Writing is a craft. Learn the craft. Yes, it’s true that just about everyone can write. But just about everyone can also hit a golf ball – that doesn’t make them a professional golfer. You’re not just “writing”. You are story-telling. And if you don’t know all that is involved in telling a great story, you can’t possibly build a great novel people are going to want to read.

LB: You’ve written a killer Foreword for my new writing book (the editors at Writers Digest Books are in love with you, I think). When Michael Hague wrote the Foreword to my last book, he admitted that he had to pause because the way I frame the principles caused him to rethink the way he teaches them. It ended up great, by the way, he realized we were on the same page with all of it, that there are many roads leading to enlightenment. I’m wondering if there was any such integration issues or hesitance on your part? 

RD: Yeah, there was. But I think that goes back to the process more than the principles. You and I both agree that you have to learn the craft. I teach those principles one way. You teach them slightly different. But we’re both saying the same thing.

We’re both teaching the reader that at some point in your novel you need an inciting incident. You need the protagonist to commit to the journey. You need an opposite force pushing against what the protagonist wants so they can’t have it, either easily or quickly. Screenwriters are very specific about the craft and principles. They go so far as to say, by page 10 of a romance this has to happen. By page 25, this has to happen. The principles haven’t changed, but the message has. Why? Because screenplays are usually 120 to 200 pages. The screenplay is written for a different medium – one that is experienced through sight and sound. So it is imperative that certain things happen at certain times. But that is really process, not principal. The principles are the same. The process to achieve those principles is different because it is a different medium.

LB: The Eighth Sister is, we now know, becoming widely regarded as a masterpiece. When you write something that is that well received, how do you face the blank page with the pressure, and perhaps the intention, to top yourself with your next novel?

RD: I never think of anything I’ve written as a masterpiece, though I appreciate the kind words. I’m always pleased if my work is well-received by readers, but as much as I love getting those emails, there’s nothing anyone can say that will make me go and change the novel. It’s done. That story is written. It’s out in the world existing. When it is, my world has changed a bit, but my job hasn’t. My job is to write the next novel, maybe a better novel, with better characters and a killer climax. That’s the fun part of this job when they’re not busy with their apps that pay instantly to cash app, always trying to write a better novel, to top oneself. I really admire Stephen King because he’ll write this terrific novel, like The Shawshank Redemption, or the Green Mile and before you’re even finished reading that masterpiece, he has another book come out. It’s kind of the way I heard Gene Hackman described. He’s a working actor. He’s always working. He’s versatile and skilled and always taking the next role because that’s what he does. He’s an actor. Sometimes he’s going to find gold. And sometimes he’s just going to play his part. That’s how I’d love to shape my career. A working writer, putting out the next novel that’s hopefully better than the last, but at the very least, is the best I can offer.

LB: I feel like I’m constantly thanking you for you willingness to weigh in on my work, and most lately, to be included in my book with this Foreword, as well as indulge me with this interview. But mostly I want to thank you, not only for your friendship, but for your inspiration and the way you lead us to the high bar to which we all aspire.

And for the books. All of them. That body of work, alone, is a gift to us all.

*****

And by the way… Robert Dugoni is still entrenched on Amazons Top 1o0 Author Rankings, even with his new novel’s launch two months in the rear-view mirror.

*****

More About Robert Dugoni
Robert Dugoni is the critically acclaimed New York Times, #1 Wall Street Journal, and #1 Amazon best-selling author of the multi-million-selling Tracy Crosswhite series. The first entry, My Sister’s Grave, has sold more than two million copies, has been optioned for television series development, and has won multiple awards and nominations. He is also the author of the best-selling David Sloane series, nominated for the Harper Less Award for legal fiction, and the stand-alone novels The 7th Canon, a 2017 finalist for the Mystery Writers of America Edgar Award for best novel, and The Cyanide Canary, A Washington Post Best Book of the Year. His latest novels include the award-winning The Extraordinary Life of Sam Hell, and The Eighth Sister, which debuted on several best-seller lists and elevated him to the #1 ranked author on Amazon.com. He is the recipient of the Nancy Pearl Award for Fiction, and the Friends of Mystery Spotted Owl Award for the best novel in the Pacific Northwest. He is a two-time finalist for the International Thriller Writers award and the Mystery Writers of America Award for best novel, among many other awards and best-of inclusions. His books are sold worldwide in more than twenty-five countries.
Learn more at his website, www.robertdugonibooks.com.

Sister's grave cover sam hell cover

Please follow and like us:

7 Responses

  1. A story is never “written” in the same way as it is “read.” You read a story one page at a time, not yet knowing what surprise is on the next page. But, you just can’t “write” a story that way – YOU have to DECIDE(!) what’s gonna be on that next page.

    But your first decision(s) might not be the best ones. You might be a long way from hitting upon “that key idea” which you can now go back and foreshadow. If you’ve already written “mountains of text,” you’re not going to go back and do that. But if you haven’t, you can. Therefore, you work out the story first, using an economy of words. (Or maybe [the digital equivalent of] 3×5″ filing cards.)

    “Plan it, then write it” was something you were taught in school when you first had to write a “term paper.” You didn’t follow that advice the first time, did you? Of course you didn’t. Until one day you realized that you were making a lot of unnecessary work for yourself – that it really did make sense to “get your ducks in a row” BEFORE putting feathers on them.

  2. Hi Mike,

    Long time no hear! I missed our conversations. Lots to catch up on. Last novel in a series being completed hopefully next month in Camp Nanowrimo. I’ve actually worked ahead on two different series to give myself a lead since I’m going to give self publishing a real shot. Started a YouTube channel under StoryDtechtive with craft tips, tech & gadget reviews…mostly stuff to make a writer’s life easier. Except for the lightsaber replicas. That part is just sort of a connecting hobby I picked up! Email is storydtechtive@gmail.com now. The old email is still there, but don’t check it consistently. @Kerry best to make note of the new email as well. Easiest way to reach me these days.

  3. Something I have lately noticed – yes, I am still working on the same project – is that (especially if you are new at this) “story exploration” is part of the process. Sometimes you just need to slide a new sheet of paper into your virtual typewriter and start typing. Maybe it’s to consider what might happen next; maybe it’s a way of working out how a scene might develop. In either case, it turns out to be somewhat a surprise. Like Forrest Gump says, “you don’t know what you’ll get.”

    So you put that typed-up sheet of paper away and refer to it later on as you =decide= where the story should go and when it should go there (if at all). You’re not “pantsing” the story itself, but to a certain extent you’re “pantsing” the scenes – “brainstorming” is probably a much more appropriate word.

    And everything … everything … everything is KEPT. Don’t like the way something turned out? KEEP IT and try again. Not sure which way you want to go? Try both! Then, KEEP both. And be sure to take a little time out of your day to go back and re-read some of it. You might discover a brand-new emerging author who you like very well!

  4. Hi Kerry!

    Sherlock Holmes also said one has to train themselves to reason in reverse from effect to cause. I think a writer has to be even more of a deductive gymnast, in that we have to be able to reason sideways, upside down, or any way in which the story arrives. Add to that the fact if you do not have a vast and growing knowledge of crime/craft (for our intent), you are reasoning without the aid of neither knowledge or experience. Thus those psychological fundamentals to which we might affix our stratagems is non-existent. So all we are left with is theory and conjecture—which is apt to be as wrong as write.

  5. A very well articulated discussion on craft. Reminds me of martial arts teachers of different styles who agree upon that the name of the game is to neutralize your opponent.

    Craft = the creative side of the brain working with the logical, structural side. This has not been encouraged in the school system and that needs to be realized. One can’t go to the gym with atrophied muscles and expect to push much weigh, or if it’s Crossfit, expect to throw tires around. The point is that you–are way out of shape.

    I love how this discussion says that Writing does not equal Story Telling. That’s saying what I said in the previous paragraph but using less detail. Hence, your mastery of words–is key here. This means you need a larger vocabulary than you use for texting on the phone. This also means that you need to explain things in your story instead of relying on acronyms, abbreviations, and tweets. This is why your creative mind has atrophied.

    Because technology is doing it all for you. Because the GPS is telling you where to go, your mind’s muscles aren’t developing. **Your mind uses the SAME muscles in a variety of ways, hence if you don’t learn to read a paper map–you won’t be good at intuitive deduction.

    Sherlock Holmes puts together the story AFTER it’s already happened. The writer does this in reverse. Are you able to utilized deconstructive analysis of social events like a forensic behavioralist? Doubt it–because this isn’t taught in school. The world wants obedient robots (obey the law and do your job…be quiet, behave). The world doesn’t want people who ask questions, who put things together.

    Many of you are already bored and are wondering what any of this has to do with writing (he’s ranting…tell him to shut up and just TELL ME HOW TO WRITE).

    Google, GPS, all the technical crap–is telling you HOW TO LIVE.

    Writing a story–is the complete opposite. You have to understand what drives human behavior so you can put together character scenes that are believable. Game of Thrones is the premier example of writers who had their characters behave OUT OF CHARACTER in the last two seasons, especially the final one. There are plenty of people who want stories that add up, and make sense! These people understand, either through life experience or analysis, what human behavior is. (These people are your best audience).

    A story is about a human who is presented with a life changing obstacle and how they adapt (behave) to it. Your job as a writer is to use WORDS (that’s all you get) to develop an experience in the reader’s mind that sees, hears, and feels your explanation–your narration of the story.

    Dugoni and Brooks are super sources for learning this. Thanks to you both!

  6. Great conversation. I loved how this went back and forth between you guys.

    And I totally agree…process is something that is not only different to each of us, but evolves as we grow as writers. I’ve pantsed, plotted, and finally arrived at officially becoming a “Plantser.” And I arrived at this—or rather, I had to admit it to myself—through the notion I never pantsed anything that didn’t require a lot of fixing and some kind of plan. I also never planned a story that didn’t evolve through the drafting process and get pantsed to some degree. I’ve come to an understand within myself, if no one else, that those larger (silly) arguments over what works best is not only subjective, but is prone to change as we change and grow. And since we can’t grow without change, don’t be surprised, or resistant, when change comes knocking.

    I’m pretty much quoting from my latest video here, but I think it’s worth repeating. Every journey is more fun if we allow ourselves to explore. So I’ve encouraged writers to not be afraid to experiment from project to project. And therein lies the secret to process. None of us find ourselves inside a box. We only grow rigid and bored. Boredom, being death for the writer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

(Spamcheck Enabled)

Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial
AWSOM Powered